Now Reading
The smarter energy path for Filipinos
Dark Light

The smarter energy path for Filipinos

The renewed pitch for nuclear power is seductive: one massive facility promising enormous output, low operating emissions, and the prestige of innovative technology. But beneath this polished promise lies a harder truth. For the Philippines—with our existing grid conditions, oversupplies, ambitious renewable energy goals, and abundant indigenous resources—nuclear is not just unnecessary. It may, in fact, derail the very progress we urgently need.

Excess capacity—not scarcity—defines our grid. Contrary to claims that our grid is on the verge of collapse, recent data show that the real challenge is not a shortage of baseload capacity, but a lack of flexible, responsive power. A heavy, inflexible nuclear plant—designed to run around the clock—makes little sense for a system that already fluctuates between oversupply and stress.

Instead of more rigid baseload plants, we need electricity sources that can ramp up or down as demand shifts: solar, wind, hydro, geothermal, and storage. A nuclear build today would risk stranding assets, distorting the market, and crowding out the flexibility the grid actually needs.

Renewables are not wishful thinking—they’re already here. Under the Department of Energy’s energy plan, the country aims for renewables to supply 35  percent of the generation mix by 2030 and 50 percent by 2040.

This is not an idle target. The country is already seeing rapid momentum: launch of major solar‑battery projects, geothermal expansions, and growing private‑sector interest.

Most strikingly, the SPECTRUM rooftop solar mapping tool, developed by the Institute of Climate and Sustainable Cities, has revealed that the Philippines already has over 1.8 gigawatts of rooftop solar capacity across 174 cities and municipalities nationwide. That’s not theoretical potential. That’s real, installed, or installable capacity mounted on homes, businesses, and public buildings—right where people live and consume power.

The study further identified 184,000 hectares of usable rooftop area, which could potentially generate 184,000 megawatts. Utilizing only 10 percent of this total area could yield another 18,400 megawatts, reducing dependence on large power plants.

Rooftop solar + distributed energy = resilience, not centralization. The deployment of around 20 gigawatts in rooftop solar is a game changer for the country. Distributed solar—on rooftops—offers benefits that large, centralized plants (nuclear or otherwise) cannot match: lower transmission losses, reduced stress on long-distance grid lines, less central infrastructure investment, and democratized ownership of energy.

By harnessing rooftop solar at scale—across homes, factories, schools, and public buildings—the Philippines can build a decentralized, resilient, and community‑owned energy future. This stands in stark contrast to the centralized, single-point-of-failure model embodied by nuclear.

Nuclear’s hidden costs: inflexibility, import dependence, and reserve strain. Proponents of nuclear energy often highlight its reliability and low direct emissions. But that reliability masks several structural burdens:

– A nuclear plant demands enormous upfront capital and decades-long commitment, tying up funds that could otherwise accelerate renewable and storage deployment.

– The Philippines lacks indigenous uranium resources, meaning we’d remain dependent on imported fuel—exposed to global supply risks, price volatility, and geopolitics.

– When a reactor trips—as inevitably happens at times—the drop in output is instantaneous. To prevent blackouts, the grid must maintain massive spinning reserves, often gas-based—effectively duplicating capacity just for backup.

– Nuclear power plants pose serious concerns on safety, waste disposal, and long-term environmental risks.

In a country blessed with solar, wind, geothermal, and hydropower potential, investing in nuclear means buying unnecessary complexity, redundancy, and risk.

The path forward is clear. If we seek to lower electricity costs, stabilize supply, and build resilience, then the answer is not another nuclear plant, but smarter investments in what already works:

See Also

– Expand rooftop and ground‑mounted solar, paired with battery and other storage systems

– Accelerate geothermal, hydro, and wind power development

– Modernize the grid for distributed generation and demand response

– Empower communities, local governments, and private consumers to adopt clean energy

These are not theoretical horizons, but shovel‑ready realities.

Nuclear power offers an illusion of a shortcut. But shortcuts sometimes lead away from the destination. The Philippines can build a resilient, affordable, and sovereign energy future—powered by our own land, our own sun, our own rooftops. We just need to choose to do it.

—————-

Pete Maniego is senior policy advisor of the Institute for Climate and Sustainable Cities and former chair of the National Renewable Energy Board, Institute of Corporate Directors, University of the Philippines Engineering Research and Development Foundation, Inc., and UP Barkada, Inc.

Have problems with your subscription? Contact us via
Email: plus@inquirer.net, subscription@inquirer.net
Landline: (02) 8896-6000
SMS/Viber: 0908-8966000, 0919-0838000

© 2025 Inquirer Interactive, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.

Scroll To Top