Now Reading
SC rule vs mining ‘trial by sentiment’ hailed
Dark Light

SC rule vs mining ‘trial by sentiment’ hailed

Jordeene B. Lagare

The Philippine Nickel Industry Association (PNIA) lauded the high court’s decision to dismiss the petition for a Writ of Kalikasan filed against Hinatuan Mining Corp. (HMC), saying it reinforces evidence-based regulation in such battles.

HMC is a unit of publicly listed Nickel Asia Corp., which operates a nickel project in Tagana-an, Surigao del Norte. It focuses on the export of saprolite and limonite ore.

In a statement on Monday, PNIA said the “landmark” ruling effectively ended the era of “trial by sentiment” in environmental litigation, marking a definitive shift in the regulatory landscape.

“The Supreme Court has sent a clear, unambiguous message: the future of Philippine industry and environmental stewardship must be built on the bedrock of scientific evidence, not the shifting sands of public conjecture and unfounded speculation,” the group said.

The SC said it had dismissed the petition “for being insufficient in form and substance.”

The high court explained that a Writ of Kalikasan is an extraordinary remedy available against an unlawful act or omission involving massive environmental damage and its issuance requires strict compliance with evidentiary standards.

It stated that the petitioners had failed to comply with the required contents of a petition and lacked the material evidence and judicial affidavits required in environmental cases.

“The petition solely relied on general allegations that the large-scale mining operations would cause environmental damage to the Island of Manicani and its surrounding areas,” it added.

See Also

Protect Manicani Island Society Inc., United Manicani Metro Manila Residence Organization Inc. and Hamorawon Manila Residence Elementary Batch Association Inc. lodged the petition against then Environment Secretary Maria Antonia Yulo-Loyzaga and HMC.

PNIA said that for the longest time, legitimate and regulated mining operations have grappled with significant delays and reputational damage due to legal woes. It claimed that complaints were usually based on general impressions, bare allegations and pure speculation.

“This strengthens investor confidence and sends a clear signal that the Philippines maintains a predictable and rules-based environment. It underscores that lawful operations, undertaken in full compliance with regulatory requirements, will be protected within the bounds of the law,” it added.

Have problems with your subscription? Contact us via
Email: plus@inquirer.net, subscription@inquirer.net
Landline: (02) 8896-6000
SMS/Viber: 0908-8966000, 0919-0838000

© 2025 Inquirer Interactive, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.

Scroll To Top