Who really runs the fashion industry?
Fashion has a curious talent for making politics look glamorous. A minister appears at a fashion week opening, a president’s wife wears a designer coat, or a luxury house dresses a head of state, and suddenly, the two worlds are sharing a photograph.
But the relationship between fashion and politics goes deeper than what people wear to a diplomatic reception. Politics determines where clothes are made, what they cost, how they cross borders, what happens to unsold stock, and which countries become the next destinations for fashion investment.
The industry may run on creativity, but it operates within rules written by governments.
The price of politics
Few things demonstrate this more clearly than tariffs. In 2026, changing US trade policy has made the geography of fashion manufacturing an increasingly complicated calculation.
Vietnam, one of the largest apparel exporters to the United States, faces a 12.5 percent US tariff under measures introduced in July. Other manufacturing countries face different rates, while new trade arrangements offer potential advantages to selected exporters using US textile inputs. The result is a shifting landscape for brands deciding where to manufacture their products.
For fashion businesses, the implications extend beyond customs paperwork. A brand that produces garments in one country rather than another may face a different cost structure, forcing it to reconsider suppliers, negotiate prices, or absorb some of the additional expense.
Consumers can eventually feel the consequences, too. If importing a garment becomes more expensive, a brand has to decide whether to accept lower margins, change its sourcing strategy, or raise its prices.
The outcome varies by company and product, but the principle is straightforward: The price on a clothing label can reflect decisions made thousands of kilometers away.
The politics of the shopping bag
Politics also determines where international visitors choose to spend their money.
The United Kingdom abolished its VAT Retail Export Scheme for most in-store purchases in Great Britain in 2021. International visitors generally can no longer claim a VAT refund on clothing and other goods bought in British shops and carried home in their luggage. The government has maintained that it has no plans to introduce a replacement scheme.
For luxury retail, this matters because shopping is part of the travel experience. A visitor choosing between London, Paris, Milan, or another international destination may consider not only the boutiques and brands available but also the final price of a purchase after taxes and any applicable refunds.
Tax policy is not the only factor influencing that decision, of course. Exchange rates, travel costs, availability, and the shopping experience all matter. Nevertheless, the rules surrounding a purchase can influence how attractive a city is to international shoppers.
When sustainability becomes law
Fashion’s political relationship is not confined to trade and tourism. Governments are increasingly setting rules around what brands can produce, sell, and discard.
In the European Union, a major change took effect on July 19. Large companies are prohibited from destroying unsold clothing, accessories, and footwear, subject to specific exceptions. Medium-sized companies will face the same prohibition from 2030. The rules form part of the EU’s Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation and aim to encourage businesses to sell, donate, or reuse products rather than destroy them.
For fashion companies, unsold inventory is no longer simply a commercial inconvenience to manage behind the scenes. Regulations can affect stock management, returns, donations, and the costs associated with disposing of unwanted products. They also raise practical questions about how businesses handle excess production and how they demonstrate compliance.
The broader lesson is that sustainability is becoming a matter of governance as well as consumer preference. A brand may choose to adopt more responsible practices because of its values or its customers, but regulation can make certain practices a legal obligation.
Who gets to become a fashion capital?
There is another side to the story: Governments are not merely regulating fashion industries; they are also trying to build them.
Saudi Arabia offers a particularly interesting example. In May 2026, the Saudi Fashion Commission signed a memorandum of understanding with Italian fashion manufacturing group MinervaHub to develop industrial expertise, exchange knowledge, and explore opportunities for local production.
The stated ambition? To strengthen the kingdom’s fashion ecosystem across design, development, manufacturing, and production.
This is significant because a fashion industry requires more than designers and runway shows. It also needs suppliers, production capabilities, specialist skills, investment, education, and commercial infrastructure.
Government partnerships can help create the conditions for these elements to develop together. Similar ambitions exist in established and emerging fashion markets, although each country has its own economic priorities, resources, and challenges.
Fashion has never existed outside politics
It is tempting to imagine fashion as an escape from the serious business of government. Yet every garment has a history that extends beyond the studio where it was designed.
Someone has to source its materials, manufacture it, transport it across borders, sell it, and eventually decide what happens when it is no longer wanted. Each stage exists within an economic and regulatory system shaped, in part, by political decisions.
That does not mean every collection is a political statement, or that every government intervention produces the same results. Trade restrictions can protect certain industries while increasing costs elsewhere. Sustainability regulations can encourage better practices while creating new compliance burdens. Investment programs can open opportunities while requiring time, infrastructure, and expertise to deliver on their ambitions.
The effects are rarely simple. But fashion is too economically significant, internationally connected, and culturally influential to exist independently of politics.
The next time a handbag becomes more expensive, a brand moves its manufacturing, or a new fashion capital begins attracting international attention, the explanation may have little to do with trends.
Sometimes, the most influential person in fashion is not sitting in the front row—they are writing the rules.
Fashion is too economically significant, internationally connected, and culturally influential to exist independently of politics.
******
Get real-time news updates: inqnews.net/inqviber
