For mineral-rich PH, green metals rush is a balancing act
DIDIPIO, KASIBU, NUEVA VIZCAYA—As the Philippines works to ramp up mining to meet global demand for metals crucial to the green energy transition, environmental groups are demanding strict limits to protect nature and indigenous lands.
The Philippines has the world’s fourth-largest copper reserves, fifth-biggest nickel deposits and is also rich in cobalt—all of which have important uses in clean energy technologies, from lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles to solar panels.
Mineral requirements for renewable energy technologies must be quadrupled by 2040 to reach the goals of the Paris Agreement, and the World Bank estimates a 500-percent increase in the demand for transition minerals.
That is encouraging mineral-rich countries like the Philippines, where mining is relatively undeveloped and only accounts for 1 percent of gross domestic product, to boost their production of so-called critical minerals.
Indigenous lands
But with nearly two-thirds of the Philippines’ mineral reserves lying on indigenous lands, environmental and rights campaigners are demanding new legislation to limit mining activity to the minimum needed for the green energy switch. (See related story in Regions, Page A10.)“Mining is a necessary evil in our civilization and daily life. But we believe in mining anchored on just minerals transition, or mining what is absolutely necessary and sourcing them responsibly,” said Maya Quirino, advocacy coordinator at the Legal Rights and Natural Resources Center (LRC), a local nonprofit that works for indigenous and environmental rights.
“For example, gold is not essential to the energy transition,” she told Context.
Quirino’s organization is leading calls for a new mining law that would only permit the “indispensable extraction” of critical minerals. It also seeks to prohibit destructive open-pit mining, or mining in sensitive ecosystems, and hike taxes on the companies to give great benefits to local communities.
Just transition?
A draft bill filed by lawmakers and supported by the LRC in 2021 is still pending in Congress, but its backers are working to gain more support this year from legislators.
Globally, the area covered by mines has doubled over the past three years, driven by demand for critical minerals, according to a 2023 study by LRC.
In the Philippines, that has exacerbated mining’s negative impacts on people and the environment—whether by depleting water supplies or forcing indigenous peoples (IP) to move elsewhere, the group said.
Mining projects in the country have often prompted protests by IPs and disputes over their land rights, and the impact of mines on the environment, including water supplies.
Recent examples include the Tampakan and Didipio gold and copper mines in South Cotabato and Nueva Vizcaya provinces, where local communities have protested over pollution and water shortages which they blame on the mines.
“Since 2017, we could no longer farm on my father’s land because it [has] dried up. Many farmlands here no longer function due to irrigation issues,” said Myrna Duyan, a member of the Tuwali indigenous group who lives near the Australian-owned open-pit Didipio mine.
Duyan said some IPs had been displaced by the mining, while others said it had split the community between those opposed to the mine and those who saw it as a welcome economic boost.
Despite the perceived economic benefits, “most of the taxes from mining goes to the national government and not to the local communities,” said Quirino, whose group says the royalties paid by mining companies should be hiked.
Under current laws, miners pay 4 percent in excise tax to the state and 1 percent in royalties to indigenous communities.
While President Marcos has vowed to overhaul the industry’s tax regime, the proposed minerals management bill is not among his priority measures and he has not commented publicly on campaigners’ wider demands.
The bill, which seeks to raise the current excise tax and royalties to 10 percent each, also seeks heavier fines on individuals and corporations for human rights and environmental harms.
“If we don’t have a framework anticipating the huge demand for minerals, we will only open the country to mining that only promises money but without a nuanced approach to our resources,” said Quirino. —Thomson Reuters Foundation
