New plastic treaty document criticized for weaker ambition
A new document attempting to resuscitate a floundering global plastics treaty suggests that negotiations are trending in a less ambitious direction, a leading scientific expert told Agence France-Presse (AFP) on Tuesday.
Talks to strike the world’s first treaty addressing humanity’s ever-growing tide of plastic pollution fell apart in August 2025 after opposition from oil-producing nations.
The first public document since that collapse was released quietly on the weekend, but quickly came under stinging criticism from environmental groups.
While it resembles a new draft text, chairperson of the talks Julio Cordano of Chile emphasized it was “an informal reference document and does not constitute a negotiated or agreed text.”
Cordano noted the document took a “balanced approach,” with subjects where “views remain divergent” put into brackets.
Richard Thompson, a British marine biologist who coined the term microplastics, told AFP the document was extremely similar to the draft text that was rejected a year ago.
“If anything, it’s even slightly weaker,” added Thompson, a researcher at Plymouth University who has served as an independent scientific observer to the talks.
Others were more scathing.
“The text cuts the international legal effort to address plastic pollution off at the knees, delivering a text that fails not only future generations, but present ones,” the Center for International Environmental Law’s David Azoulay said in a statement on Monday.
Common ground
Negotiators from 185 countries have struggled to find common ground between two broad groups.
A majority of nations have called for ambitious, legally binding measures to curb humanity’s production of plastic, which is expected to triple by 2060.
However a smaller bloc of mostly oil-producing states—including Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Russia—have pushed back against such restrictions, seeking to focus more narrowly on waste management.
Thompson suggested that rising pressure to reduce carbon emissions was leading some oil producers to seek “an alternative market for growth” by making plastic, which is derived from petroleum.
Research published in The Lancet last year estimates that the many health problems caused by plastic pollution costs the world $1.5 trillion a year.
Thompson also expressed concern that independent scientific observers, including himself, had been excluded from offering expert advice to negotiators.
Calling the treaty “a once-in-a-planet opportunity,” Thompson said he saw “no point … in agreeing on something that is too weak to deliver.”
