Spectacle over substance: The cost of electing unfit leaders

The Philippines, a proud bastion of democracy in Asia, is often plagued by incompetent and corrupt officials, despite having a system that allows free and fair elections.

One of the main reasons for this issue lies in our approach to elections. Instead of selecting leaders based on their qualifications, policies, and track record, many voters are swayed by superficial factors, like entertainment value and financial incentives. This is evident in the way some politicians campaign, focusing more on songs and dances to entertain crowds rather than addressing substantive issues. While these performances may captivate voters who prioritize spectacle over substance, they often lack real depth. Consequently, candidates skilled in entertainment rather than governance are elected into office.

Another contributing factor to the misuse of democracy in our country is vote-buying. Many politicians offer money or other material compensation in exchange for their support. This unethical practice not only undermines the integrity of the electoral process but also perpetuates a culture of corruption and dependency. By accepting these bribes, voters may feel compelled to back the candidate who paid the most rather than the most qualified individual for the position.

The repercussions of electing unfit leaders are extensive and profound. Incompetent officials in positions of power often struggle to effectively address the problems facing our country. This can result in stagnation and regression across various sectors, such as the economy, infrastructure, and social services. Additionally, the lack of accountability and transparency that typically accompanies incompetent leadership can foster widespread corruption and abuse of power.

The prioritization of entertainment and financial incentives over qualifications and policies in Philippine politics perpetuates a culture of mediocrity. By emphasizing these factors, we inadvertently communicate to politicians that substance and competence are not necessary for effective leadership. This discourages qualified individuals from seeking office and instead attracts those more interested in personal gain than public service.

When leaders are selected based on their ability to entertain or bribe voters rather than their vision and competence, our nation is unlikely to progress meaningfully. Despite our vast potential and resources, we are held back by poor governance and a lack of strategic leadership.

To address these pressing issues, we must reconsider our approach to democracy. Instead of emphasizing entertainment and financial gain, we must prioritize the election of leaders who possess the necessary qualifications, integrity, and dedication to serving the public interest. This necessitates a shift in cultural norms and values, where we demand more from our leaders and hold them accountable for their actions.

The future of democracy in the Philippines hinges on our collective willingness to demand excellence from our leaders. By focusing on substance rather than spectacle and ensuring that elected officials are held responsible for their decisions, we can cultivate a fairer and more prosperous society. This endeavor requires a united effort to foster a culture of honesty, transparency, and accountability in governance.

While the challenge ahead is formidable, it is not insurmountable. With the right mindset and institutions in place, we can overcome our current obstacles and construct a brighter future for ourselves and future generations. By cherishing democracy not only as a system of governance but as a way of life, we can establish a genuinely fair, just, and prosperous society for all.

REGINALD B. TAMAYO,

Marikina City