8 behavioral and cultural shifts reshaping trust, influence
Influence mirrors society. It reflects who we admire, what we value and, ultimately, who we decide to believe.
But the mirror has cracked. Follower counts no longer equal persuasion and visibility no longer ensures trust.
In the Philippines, where pakikisama (social harmony) and hiya (moral restraint) quietly govern social behavior, influence is shifting away from performance and toward participation, from selling to shared meaning.
This moment marks a renegotiation of social capital and moral legitimacy in digital spaces. Influence is not disappearing; it is being culturally reanchored. Brands that fail to separate signal from noise risk visibility without trust.
Here are eight behavioral and cultural shifts reshaping how trust and influence work today.
1. The commodification of authenticity
“Be real” has become both mantra and marketing. What began as honest storytelling now often feels like rehearsed vulnerability—a performance of imperfection.
Erving Goffman’s dramaturgical theory explains the backlash. When backstage behavior is repeatedly staged for the main stage, audiences sense the collapse of sincerity. Filipinos, guided by pakiramdam (relational sensitivity), are especially quick to detect when authenticity is manufactured. Once “being real” becomes a strategy, it stops feeling true.
Authenticity loses power when it is “instrumentalized.” Culturally, it is not disclosure for effect, but consistency across roles—what anthropologists would describe as moral coherence over time.
2. Micro influencers and the return of community
Trust is shifting toward smaller, relational circles that resemble real social life more than mass audiences. Micro influencers thrive because they speak from the community, not to it.
Rooted in kapwa (shared self), credibility flows from shared identity and lived proximity. This aligns with Marcel Mauss’ theory of reciprocity: utang na loob (debt of gratitude) structures trust as an ongoing social relationship, not a one-off exchange.
Influence here is not extracted; it is circulated.
This is why micro influence feels intimate rather than persuasive. It is embedded in relationship, not reach.
3. The rise of the anti-influencer
The anti-influencer who is walang arte or unpolished, direct, has become a new marker of credibility. Audiences increasingly reject aspirational excess in favor of honesty and restraint.
Pierre Bourdieu would describe this as a rejection of symbolic capital that feels excessive or misaligned. Status signals that once elevated now alienate. Meaning is cocreated with audiences, not imposed upon them.
For brands, this demands restraint. Overstructuring the message destroys the very credibility being borrowed.
4. Extravagance fatigue
Audiences are growing weary of excess. In periods of inflation and inequality, displays of privilege feel tone-deaf. Hiya, our moral barometer, renders overindulgence uncomfortable to watch.
Anthropologist Mary Douglas reminds us that societies regulate what is appropriate to display. Aspiration is being redefined from accumulation to contribution. The admired are no longer those who have the most, but those who give the most—of insight, empathy and usefulness.
Prestige is shifting from material capital to moral capital.
5. AI and virtual influencers
Artificial intelligence (AI)-generated influencers promise scale, consistency and control—but not presence.
This exposes the limits of symbolic interactionism. Trust emerges from interpreted intent, not replicated behavior.
Filipino culture prizes pakiramdam, or felt empathy that cannot be simulated. AI can mimic response, but it cannot hold accountability or moral agency.
Technology can support efficiency. Trust, however, remains irreducibly human.
6. Decentralized influence and the barkada effect
Influence now spreads laterally through barkadas (intimate groups), fandoms and micro communities where trust is cocreated. Pakikilahok (participation) and pakikipagkapwa (shared identity) make belonging the new currency.
This mirrors Victor Turner’s concept of communitas—belonging formed through shared participation rather than hierarchy. Digital kwentuhan (storytelling) allows ideas to travel with social endorsement embedded. Power is distributed, not concentrated.
Brands should facilitate, not dominate. When communities feel ownership, they amplify with conviction.
7. The activist-influencer and the ethics of voice
Socially conscious audiences now expect influencers—and the brands behind them—to take a stand. In moments of social tension, silence is rarely neutral; it is interpreted symbolically and often read as complicity.
As Clifford Geertz argued, culture is a web of meaning. Within these webs, even inaction communicates values. Grounded in bayanihan (collective care) and katarungan (justice), Filipino audiences reward voices whose advocacy aligns with lived action.
Purpose cannot be an add-on. It must be practiced.
8. The rise of de-influencin
De-influencing challenges budol (impulse to buy from hype) culture and reframes restraint as wisdom. Transparency, sustainability and emotional honesty are being rewarded.
This reflects a return to moral economies, grounded in kagandahang-loob (moral goodness) and mutual responsibility. Sometimes, the most trusted advice is “don’t buy.”
Integrity, paradoxically, builds influence.
From attention to trust
Influence today is no longer about fame or virality. It is about trust—a social currency built on empathy, credibility and cultural literacy.
Across all eight shifts, one truth stands out: influence is moving from performance to participation, from status to substance, and from attention to trust.
What this means for brands and creators:
- Prioritize relationships over reach
- Measure meaning, not vanity metrics
- Balance visibility with virtue
- Invest for endurance, not spikes
- Listen more than you broadcast.
In a trust-based economy, influence is not secured through attention alone, but through legitimacy. Brands and creators that succeed will be those that translate visibility into credibility—and credibility into sustained relevance.
Join the Conversation with 16 CEOs, managing directors, presidents
Explore these ideas in person at the 17th Mansmith Market Masters Conference on March 17 at SMX Aura. Discover how trust, opportunity, strategy and leadership intersect to shape successful businesses in the Philippines and beyond.
For more information, visit: marketmastersconference.com
******
Get real-time news updates: inqnews.net/inqviber
Josiah Go is chair and chief innovation strategist of Mansmith and Fielders Inc. He is also cofounder of the Mansmith Innovation Awards. To ask Mansmith Innovation team to help challenge assumptions in your industries, email info@mansmith.net.





Mangroves matter