Now Reading
Where skincare stops: Botox, PDRN, and the promise of NAD+
Dark Light

Where skincare stops: Botox, PDRN, and the promise of NAD+

Jacqueline Dizon

I first noticed the lines between my eyebrows after my first winter in Toronto three years ago. The cold dried out my skin in a way I had never experienced before, and suddenly there it was: a faint crease that seemed to settle in and stay. It didn’t frighten me, but it stayed on my mind. I would catch it in the mirror, sometimes softer after a good skincare day, sometimes more visible, but never fully gone.

Like most people, I started with what I knew. I hydrated more, added hyaluronic acid, and tried to stay consistent. There were moments when my skin looked better, when it felt plumper and more forgiving, but the line remained.

That was when I began to fully understand something dermatologists often say in passing: Skincare can do a lot, but it cannot do everything.

Approaching this with curiosity and care

That realization followed me to Korea, where I found myself surrounded by women I trust deeply, my mother and my aunt, both of whom have always approached beauty with intention rather than pressure. They never told me I needed anything. If anything, they reassured me that I was fine as I was.

But they created a space where I felt supported enough to make a decision for myself, not from insecurity, but from curiosity and care.

Walking into a clinic in Korea felt reassuring from the start. The process was structured, calm, and thorough. The doctors took time to study my face, not just my skin, but the way it moved. They listened before they suggested anything, and when they did, they explained every step in detail.

What stood out most was the absence of pressure. After the consultation, the nurses walked me through each recommendation again, including the cost, and gave me the freedom to remove anything that did not feel necessary. It felt collaborative rather than prescriptive.

Botox: Straightforward and tension-free

Botox for my frown lines was straightforward. The focus was not on the skin itself, but on the muscle beneath it. I learned that these lines form through repeated movement, through the way we frown, concentrate, and react over time.

Botox works by blocking the signal between the nerve and the muscle, preventing the muscle from contracting as strongly. The injections were quick and tolerable, especially with numbing, and within days, I began to notice a difference. The line softened, and my face at rest looked calmer.

What I appreciated most was that I still felt like myself. I could still express, still react, just without the constant imprint of tension sitting between my brows.

Before undergoing through any of these treatments, consider the research behind them, the doctor you choose, and your reasons for wanting it | Photo from Raghavendra V Konkathi/Unsplash

PDRN: Regeneration made gradual

Under my eyes, the story was different. I have always had darker under-eyes, something I’ve carried since I was younger. Over time, my habit of rubbing my eyes only made it worse, adding friction to an already delicate area.

PDRN was recommended to me as a way to improve the quality of the skin itself rather than simply mask the issue. Unlike Botox, which acts on muscle, PDRN supports regeneration. It is derived from DNA fragments and helps stimulate repair and collagen production.

The injections caused some swelling, and I felt them more than Botox, but the process was manageable. What I noticed afterward was not a dramatic overnight change, but a gradual shift in texture. My under-eyes looked more hydrated, more even, and over time, more awake. It did not replace skincare, but it elevated it, allowing everything else I used to work better.

NAD+: Slow but intentional

If Botox addressed movement and PDRN addressed skin, NAD+ felt like it belonged to an entirely different layer. I was introduced to it in Manila through a friend’s recommendation and later experienced it through RejuvaNAD+, a pharmaceutical-grade NAD+ therapy manufactured in South Korea and administered under a structured clinical protocol.

This distinction matters. With treatments like NAD+, quality, sourcing, and medical supervision directly affect both safety and results, and not all options available in the market are held to the same standard.

NAD+ is a coenzyme found in every cell. It plays a central role in mitochondrial function (which is how the body produces energy) and in DNA repair, which is closely tied to aging. When taken orally, much of it is broken down during digestion, limiting how much actually reaches the cells. But with RejuvaNAD+ administered through an IV drip, it bypasses that process and enters the bloodstream directly, allowing for more efficient absorption.

The protocol itself is intentional. Infusions are done slowly, sometimes over several hours, depending on the dose, to allow the body to tolerate and use it properly. Even the preparation, from hydrating beforehand to avoiding caffeine and alcohol, supports how the body processes the treatment.

The experience itself was calm. There was a brief wave of discomfort that passed through my body at the start, but it settled quickly, and the rest of the session felt easy.

See Also

But what surprised me most was how I felt afterward. There was a noticeable clarity, a lightness in my thinking that I had not expected. After my second session, that feeling became more familiar, more stable. It is not the kind of treatment that changes how you look overnight, but it does shift how you feel in your own body. That alone made me understand why consistency matters with something like NAD+, and why choosing a trusted provider and a well-structured treatment like RejuvaNAD+ is just as important as choosing the treatment itself.

A new perspective on beauty

Going through all three changed the way I think about beauty. Skincare remains essential. It maintains, protects, and supports the skin you live in every day. But it works mostly on the surface. Injectables and treatments, when done properly and under the right guidance, allow you to address specific concerns at their source, whether that is muscle movement, skin regeneration, or cellular function.

One does not replace the other. They work together, each with its own role.

What stayed with me most was not just the result, but the intention behind it. I did not feel pressured into any of these choices. I felt informed, supported, and trusted to decide for myself. Botox exceeded my expectations. PDRN gave me quiet confidence in my skin. RejuvaNAD+ introduced me to a new way of thinking about energy and aging from within.

If you are considering any of these treatments, the most important step is not the treatment itself. It is the research, the doctor you choose, and the honesty you bring to your reasons for wanting it. Do not rush the process, and do not cut corners.

When done thoughtfully, these choices are not about changing who you are. They are about taking care of yourself in a way that feels right to you.

******

Get real-time news updates: inqnews.net/inqviber

Have problems with your subscription? Contact us via
Email: plus@inquirer.net, subscription@inquirer.net
Landline: (02) 8896-6000
SMS/Viber: 0908-8966000, 0919-0838000

© 2025 Inquirer Interactive, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.

Scroll To Top