Now Reading
High Court upholds San Miguel win vs ERC
Dark Light
Market Watch
Bigger budget for DA pushed
November 23, 2002: Gov’t wants Meralco
PH co-op, Korean firm eye survival school
New Metro Manila police chief named
Gospel: November 23, 2024
DA: Pork supply stable for Christmas holidays
Talk to our people, House urges Senate

High Court upholds San Miguel win vs ERC

Avatar

The energy arm of tycoon Ramon Ang-led San Miguel Corp. gained victory as the Supreme Court rejected “with finality” the industry regulator’s plea against the termination of the supply contract between SMC and Manila Electric Co. (Meralco).

SMC disclosed this development on Tuesday, a day after its legal team received the decision from the tribunal’s First Division.

To recall, the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) sought in 2023 the High Court’s intervention after the Court of Appeals ruled in favor of South Premier Power Corp. (SPPC) and San Miguel Energy Corp. — which is now named Sual Power Inc. — and power distributor Meralco.

SPPC and Sual Power are both under San Miguel Global Power Holdings Corp.

The SC said in its decision that there was “no substantial argument to warrant a modification of this Court’s resolution…”

The SC likewise junked ERC’s request for a temporary restraining order due to “lack of merit.”

SMC’s power subsidiaries had a supply agreement with Pangilinan-led Meralco, but the former wished to have the deal ended after the ERC rejected their rate hike petition despite the spike in fuel costs. This caused billions in losses for SMC.

SPPC operates the gas-fired power plant in Ilijan, Batangas while Sual Power is the administrator of the coal-fired power plant in Sual, Pangasinan.

These companies earlier told the ERC that their losses already ballooned to P15 billion, and petitioned to recover about P5 billion.

In a message to reporters, ERC chair and chief executive officer Monalisa Dimalanta said they were already talking with the Office of the Solicitor General about any legal remedies the agency can tap into following this development.

See Also

It was not clear, however, what would happen to SMC’s monetary claims, especially if consumers had to pay for them. As of this writing, SMC has yet to reply to a request for a comment.

Dimalanta, meanwhile, said the ERC would study possible implications of the legal decision.

Sought for comments, Terry Ridon, convener of Infrawatch PH, told Inquirer that the SC’s move should “close this tumultuous chapter between the ERC and major players in the power sector.”

“Power sector stakeholders should keep their eyes on the ball, which includes raising capacities amid surging demand while ensuring the least cost to consumers,” Ridon added.


© The Philippine Daily Inquirer, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.

Scroll To Top